×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
Contact
Review article

THE EFFECT OF MATERIALISTIC AND NONMATERIALISTIC MOTIVATIONAL FACTORS TO EMPLOYEES' COMMITMENT TO WORK

By
Suvad Isaković ,
Suvad Isaković

Faculty of Polytechnic, University of Zenica , Zenica , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Ajdin Isaković ,
Ajdin Isaković

Master of Economics

Kanita Isaković
Kanita Isaković

School of Economics and Business, University of Sarajevo , Sarajevo , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Abstract

The success of each business relies on the employees' commitment to work, i.e., how and in which way employees perform their work. When consumers are offe- red the same or similar products produced by different companies and at different prices, and when the company's business result greatly depends on the quality of the work done, company management is more interested in securing its employees' full dedication to work. The generally accepted phrase "you get what you pay for" encouraged this research, whose purpose is to determine the strength of the relation- ship between materialistic and nonmaterialistic motivational factors to employees' commitment to work.

This research starts with the assumption that materialistic factors of motivation are more important motivational factors for employees when compared to nonmateriali- stic ones. Listed indicators of motivational factors represent independent variables, while the dependent variable represents the indicator 'work satisfaction', which de- termines the level of employees' commitment to work.

The research had 147 participants who work in companies from different industries and different sizes. According to the Likert scale, a structured questionnaire was used to measure the employees' attitudes. Various methods for data processing in Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) and Smart PLS3 program were used: Descriptive statistics of the sample (SPSS); Exploratory factor analysis - PCA analysis of principal components (SPSS): Factor analysis - a test of validity and confidence of the instruments (SmartPLS3); Bootstrapping analysis - testing of the hypothesis (SmartPLS3).  The conducted research shows that nonmaterialistic motivational factors, including Interpersonal relations and advancement, statistically significantly influence satisfa- ction at work, i.e., employees' commitment to the work.

References

1.
Isaković S. *Menadžment malih i srednjih preduzeća*. 2015.
2.
Vujić V. *Menadžment ljudskog kapitala*. Rijeka: Sveučilište u Rijeci, Fakultet za turistički i hotelski menadžment Opatija. 2004;
3.
Vroom V. *Work and motivation*. 1994.
4.
Rethinking rewards. *Harvard Business Review. 1993;71*(6:37–43.
5.
Stajkovic A, Luthans F. Behavioral management and task performance in organizations: Conceptual background, meta-analysis, and test of alternative models. *Personnel Psychology. 2003;56*(1:155–94.

Citation

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.