Corporate social responsibility implies the company's commitment to create and implement business strategies and activities in harmony with the environment and ethical behaviour towards stakeholders. Employees belong to the important interest groups and resources of every company, because their actions directly affect business results. The paper presents activities of corporate social responsibility towards employees. Employee motivation is important because it directly affects the productivity of workers , which further has consequences on the business results of the company. Employee motivation changes in the action of various factors from the employee's environment , inside and outside the work environment. In this paper, corporate social responsibility will be presented as a factor related to employee motivation. The main goal of this paper is to examine the relationship between corporate social responsibility and employee motivation and the possible connection between socially responsible activities toward employees and their motivation. The research will be conducted by examining the attitudes of managers about the connection between socially responsible business and motivation, because managers make decisions about employees within their work activities. The sample includes managers of large Bosnian companies.
Hercegovine A. Agencija za statistiku Bosne i Hercegovine. 2021.
2.
Andersen. Employer Attractiveness: What Effect does CSR have, and how can Organizations become ttractive to Norwegian Business Students? 2008;
3.
Buble M. Management. 2000.
4.
Carroll A, B. A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance. Academy of Management Review. 1979;4(4):479–505.
5.
Cookea F, He Q. Corporate social responsibility and HRM in China: a study of textile. Asia Pacific Business Review. 2010;16(3):355–76.
6.
Crane A, Matten D, Spence L. Corporate Social Responsibility: Readings and Cases in a Global Context. 2008.
7.
Davies I, Crane A. Corporate social responsibility in small‐and medium‐size enterprises: investigating employee engagement in fair trade companies. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility. 2010;19:126–39.
8.
Farooq R, Farooq. The multiple pathways through which internal and external corporatesocial responsibility influence organizational identification and multifoci outcomes: The moderating role of cultural and social orientations. Academy of Management Journal. 2017;6(30):954–85.
9.
Freeman E, Mcvea J. A Stakeholder Approach to Strategic Management. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2001;
10.
Handy C. What’s business for? Harward Business Review on Corporate Responsibility. 2003;54(7):65–83.
11.
Herzberg F. Motivacijsko-higijenska teorija. Prvo organizacijsko ponašanje: bitne teorije motivacije i vodstva. 2005.
12.
Krkač K. Uvod u poslovnu etiku i korporacijsku društvenu odgovornost. 2007.
13.
Letica M, Mabić M, Marijanović M. Motivacija zaposlenih i učinkovitost pružanja usluga u javnom sektoru - stavovi djelatnika MUP-a Srednjobosanske županije FBiH. Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Mostaru. 2018;24:94–107.
14.
Lin. he Correlation between Management and Employee Motivation in Sasol Polypropylene Business, South Africa. 2012.
15.
Matešić M, Pavlović D, Bartoluci D. Društveno odgovorno poslovanje. 2015.
16.
Osterloh M, Frost J. Upravljanje procesima kao temeljna kompetencija: Kako možete strateški koristiti reinženjering poslovanja. 2000;
17.
Rahimić Z. Menadžment ljudskih resursa. In: Ekonomski fakultet u Sarajevu. 2010.
18.
Skudiene V, Auruskeviciene V. The contribution of corporate social responsibility to internal employee motivation. Baltic Journal of Management. 2012;7(1):49–67.
19.
Spencer D. romoting high quality work: Obstacles and opportunities. Journal of Business Ethics. 2013;114(3):583–97.
20.
Stojanović A, Milosević I, Arsić S, Urosević S, Mihajlović I. Corporate social responsibility as a determinat of employee loyalty and business performance. Journal of Competitiveness. 2020;12(2):149–66.
21.
Suljagić S. Istraživanje faktora motivacije i zadovoljstva zaposlenika u srednjim preduzećima FBiH. BH Ekonomski forum. 2011;2(1):135–46.
22.
Štangl Šušnjar G, Zimanji V. Menadžment ljudskih resursa. 2006.
23.
Tymon W, Stumpf S, Doh J. Exploring talent management in India: The neglected role of intrinsic rewards. Journal of World Business. 2010;45(2):109–21.
24.
Vogel D. Is there a market for virtue: The business case for corporate socialresponsibility. California Management Review. 2005;47(4):19–45.
25.
1970;
26.
2014;
Citation
Copyright
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
