Bulancak Kadir Karabaş School of Applied Sciences , Giresun , Turkey
Giresun University, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences , Giresun , Turkey
Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Bucak Zeliha Tolunay School of Applied Business and Technology , Burdur , Turkey
Gaziantep University, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences , Gaziantep , Turkey
The purpose of this study is to investigate the causality relationship among the GEPU (Global Economic Political Uncertainty) index and the stock market index of the MIKTA countries. Accordingly, Hatemi-J (2012) asymmetric causality test was applied to investigate the existence of a relationship between the stock markets of the MIKTA countries and the GEPU index. In the study using monthly data, the period between 1999 and 2022, which is the widest data range for all variables, was taken into consideration. First of all, Lee-Strazicich unit root test was used to test the stationarity of the variables and it was observed that the variables were stationary at different levels. Then, the GEPU index is taken as the dependent variable and models are constructed as paired tests for each MIKTA country stock market. (Walmex) for Mexico, (Jakarta45) for Indonesia, (Kospi200) for South Korea, (BIST100) for Türkiye, and (ASX) for Australia are taken as the representative indices of MIKTA country stock markets. The results of the study show that there is a statistically significant causality effect of the GEPU index on stock markets. In general, a negative change in the GEPU index is found to be more dominant on stock markets compared to a positive change. On a country basis, it is found that an increase in the GEPU index causes a decrease in the Mexican, South Korean and Turkish stock markets. In addition, the lack of causality effect in the Australian stock market is interpreted as the fact that this stock market moves more independently from this index.
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.