×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
Contact
Review article

DIFFERENCES IN THE BRAND NAMING PROCESS BETWEEN B2B AND B2C COMPANIES IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA

By
Nenad Brkić ,
Nenad Brkić

School of Economics and Business , Sarajevo , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Esmeralda Marić
Esmeralda Marić

School of Economics and Business , Sarajevo , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Abstract

The literature suggests potential differences in brand naming approaches between business-to-business (B2B) and business-to-consumer (B2C) markets. Therefore, using the model of the brand naming process proposed by a group of authors, this study aims to determine the differences in the brand naming process between companies operating in the business and the consumer markets in an unexplored research context of Bosnia and Herzegovina (B&H). The research was conducted on 50 companies from B&H using an online survey. The results indicate that B2B companies are more likely to use the company (family) brand name and that B2C companies test ideas more often than B2B companies. Furthermore, the results show differences between B2B and B2C companies regarding branding objectives and brand name criteria. The limitation of this research is primarily the lack of an updated register of contacts of companies at the moment of the data collection.

References

1.
Ab Gani MAA, Ramlie MK, Ramli I, Khairudin KA, Pahme NFM. Brand Naming Process in Malaysia Small and Medium Enterprise: A Need Assessment Analyses". Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences. 2023;13(5):2164–71.
2.
Arthur J, Bejaei M. The Process of Creating a New Brand Name for a Fruit Variety. A Review and Suggested Improvements" Horticulturae. 2022;8(11):990.
3.
Blackett T. Trademark. 1998.
4.
Clifton R, Simmons J. Brands and branding. 2003.
5.
Collins L. A Name to Conjure With". European Journal of Marketing. 1977;11(5):337–63.

Citation

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.