×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Review article

INFLUENCE OF CUSTOMER-BASED BRAND EQUITY ON NEOLUXURY BRAND PURCHASE INTENTIONS: ARE THERE DISTINCTIONS AMONG INCOME GROUPS?

By
Nedžla Maktouf ,
Nedžla Maktouf

School of Economics and Business, University of Sarajevo , Sarajevo , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Adi Alić
Adi Alić

School of Economics and Business, University of Sarajevo , Sarajevo , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Abstract

This study investigates the direct effect of brand market value on consumer purchase intentions of neo-luxury brands. Additionally, this study examines how the consumer's income affects the established relationship in the conceptual research model, i.e. how the market value of the brand affects consumer purchase intentions. The data was collected through an online survey of a representative group of evenly distributed respondents, observed by different income categories. In order to validate the suggested conceptual model, we used structural equation modeling. The results show that, for neo-luxury brands, consumer purchase intentions are positively impacted by the brand's market value. Furthermore, our results show that the level of customer income is not statistically significant, leading us to draw the conclusion that there are no significant differences between how customers from various income groups perceive various brand value components or how these components affect their intentions to purchase neo-luxury brands. This research expands the knowledge about consumer purchase intentions of neo-luxury brands.

References

1.
Strauss W, Howe N. *Generations: The history of America’s future, 1584 to 2069*. 1991.
2.
Liljander V, Polsa P, Riel A. Modeling Consumer Responses to an Apparel Store Brand: Store Image as a Risk Reducer”. *Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services*. 2009;16(4):281–90.
3.
Lissitsa S, Kol O. Generation X vs. Generation Y – A decade of online shopping”. *Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services*. 2016;31:304–12.
4.
Liu MT, Wong IA, Tseng TH, Chang AWY, Phau I. Applying consumer-based brand equity in luxury hotel branding”. *Journal of Business Research*. 2017;192–202.
5.
Madahi A, Sukati I. The Effect of External Factors on Purchase Intention Amongst Young Generation in Malaysia”. *International Business Research*. 2012;5(8):153–9.
6.
Martin CA. From high maintenance to high productivity: What managers need to know about Generation Y”. *Industrial and Commercial Training*. 2005;37(1):39–44.
7.
Parment A. Generation Y vs. Baby Boomers: Shopping behavior, buyer involvement, and implications for retailing”. *Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services*. 2013;20(2):189–99.
8.
Paul J. Masstige model and measure for brand management”. *European Management Journal*. 2018;37(3):299–312.
9.
Rodrigues C, Rodrigues P. Brand love matters to Millennials: The relevance of mystery, sensuality, and intimacy to neo-luxury brands”. *The Journal of Product and Brand Management*. 2019;28(7):830–48.
10.
Seringhaus RFH. Cross-cultural exploration of global brands and the internet”. In: *Proceedings of the 8th Annual IMP Conference*. 2002.
11.
Silverstein MJ, Fiske N. Luxury for the masses”. *Harvard Business Review*. 2003;81:48–57.
12.
Lee JW. The Role of Demographics on the Perceptions of Electronic Commerce Adoption”. *Academy of Marketing Studies Journal*. 2010;14(1):71–89.
13.
Sweeney JC, Soutar GN, Johnson LW. The role of perceived risk in the quality-value relationship: A study in a retail environment”. *Journal of Retailing*. 1999;75(1):77–105.
14.
Thong X, Hawley JM. Measuring customer-based brand equity: Empirical evidence from the sportswear market in China”. *Journal of Product & Brand Management*. 2009;18(4):262–71.
15.
Veblen TB. *The Theory of the Leisure Class*. 1899.
16.
Yang DJ, Huang KC, Feng X. A Study of the Factors that Affect the Impulsive Cosmetics Buying of Female Consumers in Kaoshiung”. *International Journal of Business and Social Science*. 2011;2(24):37–44.
17.
Yoo B, Donthu N, Lee S. An examination of selected marketing mix elements and brand equity”. *Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science*. 2000;28(2):195–211.
18.
Yoo B, Donthu N. Developing and Validating a Multidimensional Consumer-Based Brand Equity Scale”. *Journal of Business Research*. 2001;52(1):1–14.
19.
Yusoff WF, Kian TS. Generation Differences in Work Motivation: From Developing Country Perspective”. *International Journal of Economy, Management and Social Sciences*. 2013;2(4):97–103.
20.
Washburn JH, Plank RE. Measuring Brand Equity: An Evaluation of a Consumer-Based Brand Equity Scale”. *Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice*. 2002;10(1):46–62.
21.
Wood L. Brands and Brand equity: Definition and Management”. *Management Decision*. 2000;38(9):662–9.
22.
Wood S. Generation Z as consumers: Trends and innovation”. *Institute for Emerging Issues: NC State University*. 2013;119(9):7767–79.
23.
Godey B, Manthiou A, Pederzoli D, Rokka J, Aiello G, Donvito R, et al. Social media marketing efforts of luxury brands: Influence on brand equity and consumer behavior”. *Journal of Business Research*. 2016;69(12):5833–41.
24.
Aaker DA. Measuring Brand Equity Across Products and Markets". *California Management Review*. 1996;38(3):102–20.
25.
Alam I. Removing the fuzziness from the fuzzy front-end of service innovations through consumer interactions”. *Industrial Marketing Management*. 2006;35:468–80.
26.
Amaldoss W, Jain S. Conspicuous consumption and sophisticated thinking”. *Management Science*. 2005;51(10):1449–66.
27.
Berthon P, Pitt L, Parent M, Berthon JP. Aesthetics and ephemerality: Observing and preserving the luxury brand”. *California Management Review*. 2009;52(1):45–66.
28.
Chang H, Hsu C, Chung S. The Antecedents and Consequences of Brand Equity in Service Markets”. *Asia Pacific Management Review*. 2008;13(3):601–24.
29.
Cristini H, Kauppinen-Räisänen H, Barthod-Prothade M, Woodside A. Toward a general theory of luxury: Advancing from workbench definitions and theoretical transformations”. *Journal of Business Research*. 2017;70:101–7.
30.
Crosno J, Freling TH, Skinner SJ. Does brand social power mean might? Exploring the influence of brand social power on brand evaluation”. *Psychology and Marketing*. 2009;26(2):91–121.
31.
Edmunds J, Turner B. Global generations: Social change in the twentieth century”. *The British Journal of Sociology*. 2005;56:559–77.
32.
Farquhar PH. Managing brand equity”. *Marketing Research*. 1989;1(3):24–33.
33.
Fionda AM, Moore CM. The anatomy of the luxury fashion brand”. *Journal of Brand Management*. 2009;16(5–6):347–63.
34.
Aaker DA. *Managing brand equity: Capitalizing on the value of a brand name*. 1991.
35.
Herrando C, Jimenez-Martinez J, Martin-De Hoyos MJ. Tell me your age and I tell you what you trust: The moderating effect of generations”. *Internet Research*. 2019;29(4):799–817.
36.
Housand A. Centennials: The world is waiting!”. *National Association for Gifted Children*. 2016;6–9.
37.
Husain R, Ahmad A, Khan BM. The impact of brand equity, status consumption, and brand trust on purchase intention of luxury brands”. *Cogent Business and Management*. 2022;9(1):1–19.
38.
Hyun JL, Cho HJ, Xu W, Fairhurst A. The Influence of Consumer Traits and Demographics on Intention to Use Self-Service Checkouts”. *Journal of Marketing Intelligence and Planning*. 2010;28(1):46–59.
39.
Jung J, Shen D. Brand equity of luxury fashion brands among Chinese and US young female consumers”. *Journal of East-West Business*. 2011;17(1):48–69.
40.
Keller KL. Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity”. *Journal of Marketing*. 1993;57:1–22.
41.
Kim HB, Kim WG, An JA. The effect of consumer-based brand equity on firms’ financial performance”. *Journal of Consumer Marketing*. 2003;20(4):335–51.
42.
Kotler P, Armstrong G. *Marketing Principles*. 2006;
43.
Kumar A, Paul J. Mass prestige value and competition between American versus Asian laptop brands in an emerging market - Theory and evidence”. *International Business Review*. 2018;27(5):969–81.
44.
Kumar A, Paul J, Unnithan AB. ‘Masstige’ marketing: A review, synthesis and research agenda”. *Journal of Business Research*. 2020;113:384–98.

Citation

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.