×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Review article

Impact of key account management orientation on company's non-financial performance

By
Vasva Klopić ,
Amer Klopić ,
Amer Klopić
Adi Alić
Adi Alić

Abstract

Key account management (KAM) in theory is described as a strategic approach distinguishable from account management or key account selling that should be used to endure long-term development and retention of strategic customers. This article presents the importance of key account management orientation in today's business and how it affects the non-financial performance of companies in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Also, we will present the results of ongoing research that aims to identify the influence of key account management orientation on company non-financial performance in different industry sectors. Data were collected from several companies in different industries considering a company as a unit of analysis. Research instrument - questionnaire compromised scales that had been validated and found reliable in previous research. Item total reliability and confirmatory factor analysis will be used to test the reliability and validity of the constructs. Furthermore, the structural equation modelling (SEM) technique will be employed to analyze the effects of key account management orientation on a company's non-financial performance. It is to be expected that the results of the conducted research show a statistically significant impact of key account management orientation on a company's non-financial performance in Bosnia and Herzegovina.

References

1.
Abratt R, Kelly PM. Customer–supplier partnerships: Perceptions of a successful key account management program. Industrial Marketing Management. 2002;31(5):467–76.
2.
Barrett J. Why major account selling works. Industrial Marketing Management. 1986;15(1):63–73.
3.
Bentler PM. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin. 1990;107(2):238–46.
4.
Boles J, Johnston W, Gardner A. The selection and organization of national accounts: a North American perspective. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing. 1999;
5.
Browne MW, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Testing Structural Equation Models. 1993.
6.
Cespedes FV. Coordinating sales and marketing in consumer goods firms. Journal of Consumer Marketing. 1993;
7.
Davies IA, Ryals LJ. The effectiveness of key account management practices. Industrial Marketing Management. 2014;43(7):1182–94.
8.
Davies IA, Ryals LJ. The effectiveness of Key Account Management practices. Industrial Marketing Management. 2014;43(7):1182–94.
9.
Diamantopoulos A, Siguaw JA. Introducing LISREL. 2000.
10.
Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research. 1981;18(1):39–50.
11.
Gerbing D, Anderson J. An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment. Journal of Marketing Research. 1988;25:186–92.
12.
Gosselin DP, Bauwen GA. Strategic account management: customer value creation through customer alignment. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing. 2006;21(6):376–85.
13.
Gounaris S, Tzempelikos N. Key account management orientation and its implications: A conceptual and empirical examination. Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing. 2013;20(1):33–50.
14.
Gounaris S, Tzempelikos N. Relational key account management: Building key account managmentt effectiveness through structural reformations and relationship management skills. Industrial Marketing Management. 2014;43(7):1110–23.
15.
Guenzi P, Georges L, Pardo C. The impact of strategic account managers’ behaviors on relational outcomes: An empirical study. Industrial marketing management. 2009;38(3):300–11.
16.
Guesalaga R, Johnston W. What’s next in key account management research? Building the bridge between the academic literature and the practitioners’ priorities. Industrial Marketing Management. 2010;39(7):1063–8.
17.
Guesalaga R, Gabrielsson M, Rogers B, Ryals L, Cuevas JM. Which resources and capabilities underpin strategic key account management? Industrial marketing management. 2018;75:160–72.
18.
Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE. Multivariate data analysis. 2010.
19.
Homburg C, Pflesser C. A multiple-layer model of market-oriented organisational culture: Measurement issues and performance outcomes. Journal of Marketing Research. 2000;37(4):449–62.
20.
A configurational perspective on key account management. Journal of marketing. 2002;66(2):38–60.
21.
Hu LT, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling. 1999;6(1):1–55.
22.
Hurley RF, Hult TG. Innovation, market orientation, and organisational learning: An integration and empirical examination. Journal of Marketing. 1998;62(3):42–54.
23.
Ivens BS, Pardo C. Are key account relationships different? Empirical results on supplier strategies and customer reactions. Industrial Marketing Management. 2007;36(4):470–82.
24.
Ivens BS, Pardo C. Are key account relationships different? Empirical results on supplier strategies and customer reactions. Industrial Marketing Management. 2007;36(4):470–82.
25.
Jones E, Dixon AL, Chonko LB, Cannon JP. Key accounts and team selling: a review, framework, and research agenda. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management. 2005;25(2):181–98.
26.
Kumar P, Sharma A, Salo J. A bibliometric analysis of extended key account management literature. Industrial Marketing Management. 2019;82:276–92.
27.
MacCallum RC, Browne MW i S, H.M. Power Analysis and Determination of Sample Size for Covariance Structure Modeling. Psychological Methods. 1996;1(2):130–49.
28.
McDonald M. Key account management–a domain review. The Marketing Review. 2000;1(1):15–34.
29.
McDonald M, Millman T, Rogers B. Key account management: Theory, practice and challenges. Journal of Marketing Management. 1997;13(8):737–57.
30.
Medsker GJ, Williams LJ, Holahan PJ. A review of current practices for evaluating causal models in organisational behavior and human resources management research. Journal of Management. 1994;20(2):439–64.
31.
Millman T, Wilson K. Processual issues in key account management: underpinning the customer‐facing organisation. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing. 1999;
32.
Millman TF. Global key account management and systems selling. International Business Review. 1996;5(6):631–45.
33.
Nunnally JC. Psychometric theory. 1978.
34.
Ojasalo J. Key account management at company and individual levels in business to business relationships. Vol. 69, Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing. 2001.
35.
Pardo C. Key account management in the business to business field: the key account’s point of view. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management. 1997;17(4):17–26.
36.
Pardo C, Ivens BS, Wilson K. Differentiation and alignment in KAM implementation. Industrial Marketing Management. 2014;43(7):1136–45.
37.
Pegram RM. Selling and servicing the national account. 1972;
38.
Pels J. Identification and management of key clients. European Journal of Marketing. 1992;26(5):5–21.
39.
Ryals LJ, Humphries AS. Managing key business-to-business relationships: what marketing can learn from supply chain management. Journal of Service research. 2007;9(4):312–26.
40.
Salojärvi H, Sainio LM, Tarkiainen A. Organizational factors enhancing customer knowledge utilization in the management of key account relationships. Industrial Marketing Management. 2010;39(8):1395–402.
41.
Sengupta S, Krapfel RE, Pusateri MA. Switching costs in key account relationships. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management. 1997;17(4):9–16.
42.
Sengupta S, Krapfel RE, Pusateri MA. An empirical investigation of key account salesperson effectiveness. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management. 2000;20(4):253–61.
43.
Sharma A. Who prefers key account management programs? An Investigation of Business. Characteristics, Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management. 1997;17(4):27–39.
44.
Sharma A. Success factors in key accounts. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing. 2006;
45.
Sharma S, Mukherjee S, Kumar A, Dillon WR. A simulation study to investigate the use of cutoff values for assessing model fit in covariance structure models. Journal of Business Research. 2005;58(7):935–43.
46.
Speakman JI, Ryals L. Key account management: the inside selling job. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing. 2012;
47.
Stevenson TH, Page AL. The adoption of national account marketing by industrial firms. Industrial Marketing Management. 1979;8(1):94–100.
48.
Stevenson TH. Payoffs from national account management. Industrial Marketing Management. 1981;10(2):119–24.
49.
Tanaka JS. How big is big enough?”: Sample size and goodness of fit in structural equation models with latent variables. Child Development. 1987;58:134–46.
50.
Tzempelikos N, Gounaris S. Key account management orientation and its impact on company’s performance–an empirical study. In: The Sustainable Global Marketplace. 2015. p. 44–7.
51.
Tzempelikos N, Gounaris S. Linking key account management practices to performance outcomes. Industrial Marketing Management. 2015;45:22–34.
52.
Walter A, Ritter T. The influence of adaptations, trust, and commitment on value-creating functions of customer relationships. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing. 2003;18(4/5):353–65.
53.
Wengler S, Ehret M, Saab S. Implementation of Key Account Management: Who, why, and how?: An exploratory study on the current implementation of Key Account Management programs. Industrial Marketing Management. 2006;35(1):103–12.
54.
Intra-organizational determinants of key account management effectiveness. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 2003;31(1):3–21.

Citation

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.