Unconventional monetary measures utilization has proven to be of great importance in maintaining monetary and economic stability after the Great Recession. However, we aim to test this conclusion through the impact of the quantitative easing implemented by the European Central Bank. Observed through generated shocks in the balance sheet of the Eurosystem as our main variable, we tested whether quantitative easing reestablished economic growth and rose price levels, mainly through lowering borrowing costs for banks, thus helping in the post-crisis recovery. To prove our hypotheses we construct a recursive VAR model estimated in levels using 2014M05-2018M12 data. The model incorporates variables such as the industrial production and the HICP, as output and price level proxies, and financial components such as the EONIA-MRO spread and the CISS index. The results show that the expansion shocks of the consolidated balance sheet have a positive temporary influence on industrial production and the HICP, but the reaction of the former seems to be 2.24 times greater. On the other hand, we find out that quantitative easing has an expected negative impact in widening the EONIA-MRO spread. Furthermore, we could not confirm the theoretically expected accommodative impact on financial stress.
Baldwin RE, Wyplosz C. The economics of European integration”. 2009.
3.
Boeckx J, Dossche M, Peersman G. Effectiveness and transmission of the ECB’s balance sheet policies”. International Journal of Central Banking. 2014;13(1):297–333.
4.
Carlin W, Soskice D. The 3-equation New Keynesian Model---a graphical exposition”. The BE Journal of Macroeconomics. 2005;5(1):1–36.
5.
Eser F, Schwaab B. Assessing asset purchases within the ECB’s securities markets programme”. working paper. 2013;(1587).
6.
Fischer S. Monetary policy, financial stability, and the zero lower bound”. American Economic Review. 2016;106(5):39–42.
7.
Friedman BM. Has the financial crisis permanently changed the practice of monetary policy? Has it changed the theory of monetary policy?”. 2014;
8.
Gambacorta L, Hofmann B, Peersman G. The effectiveness of unconventional monetary policy at the zero lower bound: A cross‐country analysis”. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking. 2014;46(4):615–42.
9.
Hafemann L, Tillmann P. The aggregate and country-specific effectiveness of ECB policy: Evidence from an external instruments (VAR) approach”. 2017;
10.
Hálová K. The Impact of Unconventional Monetary Policy of ECB to Central and Eastern European Countries: A Panel VAR Analysis”. 2015.
11.
Hauck A, Neyer U. The euro area interbank market and the liquidity management of the Eurosystem in the financial crisis”. Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf, Economics, Finance, and Taxation Discussion Paper. 2010;2.
12.
Lombardi D, Siklos P, Amand S. A survey of the international evidence and lessons learned about unconventional monetary policies: Is a ‘new normal’ in our future?”. Journal of Economic Surveys. 2018;32(5):1229–56.
13.
Lütkepohl H. New Introduction to Multiple Time Series Analysis”. 2005.
14.
Peersman G. Macroeconomic effects of unconventional monetary policy in the euro area”. 2011;
15.
Rogoff K. Dealing with monetary paralysis at the zero bound”. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2017;31(3):47–66.
16.
Sims CA, Stock JH, Watson MW. Inference in linear time series models with some unit roots”. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society. 1990;58(1):113–44.
17.
Trpkova M. Applied vector autoregressive models in macroeconomic modeling“. 2014. p. 114–85.
18.
Zabala JA, Prats MA. The unconventional monetary policy of the European Central Bank: Effectiveness and transmission analysis”. The World Economy. 2020;43(3):794–809.
Citation
Copyright
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
